Submitted Comments

Items Related to Quality Measures

March 2, 2018

Comments to CMS on “Hospital Harm - Hospital-Acquired Condition: Pressure Injury" Measure

 

The Alliance expressed its concern about CMS’ Hospital Harm- Hospital-Acquired Condition -Pressure Injury measure. While the Alliance supports and encourages the continued development of quality measures that assess wound care outcomes, the Alliance flagged that the intended objective will not be achieved the way this measure has been crafted. Overall, the specific language as well as the numerator and denominator, contained within this document are not accurate, wrote the Alliance in its comments. Furthermore, there are scientifically incorrect statements within this proposed measure.  “It is very concerning that CMS has tied a Pressure Injury Measure to Hospital Harm. As stated throughout our comments – it is possible for a patient to develop or have a pressure ulcer without any harm. If this measure continues as a quality indicator to measure harm, there will be unintended consequences - either an increase in the number of lawsuits, or an increased likelihood that hospitals will be unable to defend themselves against frivolous litigation - despite the best care being provided.”
View Alliance comment
November 20, 2017

Comments to CMS “Request For Information” on the new direction of the Center for Medicaid and Medicare Innovation

The Alliance submitted comments to CMS’ request for information on new directions for the CMMI after convening many conference calls with members to determine issues of importance. Comments focused on opportunities within specialty physician models, program integrity, and benefit design/price transparency. The Alliance focused on the growing importance of real-world evidence and patient registry data.  Comments spoke once again to the importance of developing quality measures that are more relevant to wound care and pointed again to the relevance of HCPCS coding reform to the CMMI’s focus on improved payment models – given the correlation of coding and payment in practice. Finally, the Alliance highlighted other models for CMMI consideration, including patient accountability models and Voluntary Quality Improvement Reporting Model for Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy and population management models. 
View Alliance Comment
September 11, 2017

Comment on the proposed CY 2018 Physician Fee Schedule

The Alliance submitted comments to CMS on the proposed CY2017 Physician Fee Schedule. Comment focused on:
  • The under estimation and erroneous valuation of 2 CPT codes: CPT 29580 (Strapping of Unna Boot), and CPT 29581 (Application of multi-layer compression system).
  • Supporting the decision to update the equipment items and the amount of oxygen for hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) so that the amount of oxygen conforms to the RUC recommended value.
  • Requesting national payment rate for CPT Codes 97607 and 97608 - describing negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) services using a disposable device - similar to the rate proposed in the CY2018 hospital outpatient proposed rule.
  • In response to CMS’s request for information on flexibility and efficiency opportunities to increase care, reduce costs and reduce burdens for clinicians and patients, the Alliance asked the agency to consider reform of the process it uses to assign new Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System (HCPCS) Level II billing codes to durable medical equipment, prosthetics, orthotics, and supplies (DMEPOS). 
View Alliance Comment
August 21, 2017

Comments to CMS CY Updates to the Quality Payment Program

The Alliance submitted comments to CMS addressing the agency’s proposed updates to the Quality Payment Program (CMS-5522-P).  Comments focused on the lack of relevant quality measures addressing the needs of wound care clinicians. The Alliance suggested that the creation of additional wound care quality measures is necessary to ensure continued quality care. Comments supported the use of QCDRs and the ability of all eligible clinicians to use the QCDR option for reporting.
View Alliance Comment
December 19, 2016

Comments on MACRA final rule guiding MIPS and APMs

The Alliance submitted comments to CMS on its rule: Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) and Alternative Payment Model (APM) Incentive Under the Physician Fee Schedule, and Criteria for Physician-Focused Payment Models. Comments focused on ensuring that CMS considered of the impacts of the evolving value-based care/payment reform policies to wound care. The Alliance submitted comments to MACRA's quality physician payment proposed rule as well as on the "quality measures development plan," "patient relationships categories and codes," and "episode groups" draft policies.
View Alliance Comment 
August 12, 2016

Comments on CMS Patient Relationship Categories and Codes

The Alliance submitted comments to CMS’s on its draft policy on Patient Relationship Categories and Codes. Comments noted that the proposed rule puts another burden on the clinician for tracking, coding and documentation but adds no value to patient care, or treatment outcomes. The Alliance emphasized to CMS that currently under MIPS, there are no quality measures that a wound care clinician can report for the actual wound care treatment they perform. As such, the obligatory reporting of quality, resource use, and clinical performance measures may not truly be indicative of neither the wound care work wound care practitioners do nor of the resources that they use to treat their patients. Thus, resource use for any wound care clinician will be skewed until this issue is resolved. The Alliance suggested that the Patient Relationship Categories and Codes rule be delayed at least unto 2018 or beyond to allow clinicians sufficient time to adjust to all the other MACRA and MIPS documentation and reporting changes and challenges.
View Alliance Comment
March 1, 2016

Comments on MACRA Episode Groups

The Alliance submitted comments to CMS on MACRA Episode Groups. In its comments, the Alliance reported that chronic wounds and ulcers are reaching epidemic proportions in the United States. Despite their prevalence, this problem remains off the CMS radar screen even though Medicare will devote at least $30 billion dollars to their treatment this year (and by some estimates, twice that amount). The Alliance urged CMS to create episodes of care around the following high resource use conditions:
  • Diabetic foot ulcers
  • Venous stasis ulcers
  • Stage 3 and 4 pressure ulcers
View alliance comment
March 1, 2016

Comments to CMS on CMS Quality Measure Development Plan

The Alliance submitted comments to CMS on its Quality Measure Development Plan. The Alliance emphasized chronic wound care’s significant economic burden to Medicare and other health care payers. The Alliance encouraged CMS to also adopt measures used in Qualified Clinical Data Registries (QCDR) while also utilizing those under PQRS.
VIEW ALLiance Comment
October 7, 2011

Submitted wound care quality measures to CMS

Support surface or offloading of patients with stage III/IV pressure ulcers 
view alliance form
view alliance spec 
view alliance letter
Offloading status for patients with DFU 
view alliance form 
view alliance spec
view alliance letter
Vascular testing of patients with leg ulcers 
view alliance form
view alliance spec
view alliance letter
Venous compression each visit of patients with venous stasis ulcers
view alliance form
view alliance spec
view alliance letter


logo
Email: marcia@woundcarestakeholders.org
Phone: 301.530.7846
Fax: 301.530.7946
5225 Pooks Hill Road
Suite 627 South
Bethesda, Maryland 20814
Follow us on:
linkedin