Submitted Comments

Items Related to DMEMACs

January 4, 2018

DMEMAC response to Alliance request for an advisory article addressing surgical dressing webinar

The DMEMACs responded to the Alliance’s December 2017 letter flagging inconsistencies between the guidance the DMEMACs provided to the Alliance in an October 2017 “clarification letter” and the instructions that Noridian gave in a November educational webinar on the surgical dressing LCD.
View Alliance Comment
December 18, 2017

Letter to DMEMACs requesting clarification of misinformation shared on surgical dressing educational webinar

The Alliance alerted the DMEMACs that the information being given out on the Nov. 30, 2017 Noridian surgical dressing educational webinar about the new surgical dressing LCD differed from the information provided to the Alliance in the Oct. 20, 2017 “clarification letter.” The DMEMAC medical directors had developed the clarification letter for the Alliance in response to its detailed questions. The Alliance suggested that a more formal DMEMAC Advisory would be appropriate so that other stakeholders could benefit from the clarity provided to the Alliance regarding the surgical dressing policy.
View Alliance Comment 
October 11, 2017

Durable Medical Equipment Medicare Administrative Contractor (DMEMAC) response to Alliance September 2017 letter to clarify issues in the Surgical Dressing LCD

The DMEMACS sent the Alliance a “clarification letter” in October 2017, responding to our September letter requesting clarity on issues that the Alliance had raised with regard to collagen dressings, staging systems and hydrogels - areas of the LCD that would cause confusion in clinical practice and impact patient care/patient access to products and services.
View Alliance Comment
September 11, 2017

Letter to the DMEMACs requesting clarifications on surgical dressing LCD (L33831)

The Alliance submitted a letter to the DMEMAC Medical Directors regarding the application of New Provisions of Surgical Dressing LCD (L33831). The letter reported to the DMEMACs that there was significant disagreement and confusion over how certain LCD provisions should be applied. The Alliance requested clarification on the coverage criteria for collagen dressings and for clarity on confusing wound staging criteria and pressure injury terminology included in the policy.
View Alliance Comment
January 7, 2016

Letter to DMEMAC medical directors requesting that the LCDs for pneumatic compression devices conform to the binding national coverage determination

The Alliance submitted a letter to DMEMAC Medical Directors on the LCDs for pneumatic compression devices (PCD). The letter reiterated past comments submitted addressing the LCD for Pneumatic Compression Devices (PCDs) that took effect on December 1, 2015. The Alliance again emphasized its opinion that the scope of coverage under the LCDs is far more restrictive than the NCD for pneumatic compression devices. We again assert that the new LCD does not merely “clarify” existing requirements as stated by the DMDs, but rather adds a number of new substantive binding criteria that are more restrictive than the NCD; the practical effect of these changes eliminates beneficiary access to PCDs that has long been afforded by the NCD. There is no doubt that if a beneficiary had access to a PCD on November 30, 2015 based on existing criteria, but that same patient no longer qualified for PCD coverage on December 1, 2015 based on new LCD criteria, then those new criteria are more restrictive – and that is the case for a large number of beneficiaries.
view alliance comment
logo
Email: marcia@woundcarestakeholders.org
Phone: 301.530.7846
Fax: 301.530.7946
5225 Pooks Hill Road
Suite 627 South
Bethesda, Maryland 20814
Follow us on:
linkedin