Studies and Publications
The Alliance supports research and studies to forward wound care and demonstrate its value.
Three wound care quality measures developed by the Alliance of Wound Care Stakeholders and the US Wound Registry (USWR) are now included on Centers of Medicare and Medicaid Services’ (CMS) Physician Compare website, following a summertime content update that expanded quality performance data on the site. The USWR quality measures selected for Physician Compare reporting are:
READ ALLIANCE NEWS RELEASE
- “Adequate off-loading of diabetic foot ulcer at each treatment visit.”
- “Adequate compression of venous leg ulcers at each treatment visit.”
- “Vascular assessment of patients with chronic leg ulcers.”
A new study, “An Economic Evaluation of the Impact, Cost, and Medicare Policy Implications of Chronic Nonhealing Wounds
,” published in the International Society For Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research’s Value in Health
journal (Jan. 2018) demonstrates the economic impact and full burden of chronic nonhealing wounds in the Medicare population. The study analyzed the Medicare 5% Limited Data Set for CY2014 to determine the cost of chronic wound care for Medicare beneficiaries in aggregate, by wound type, and by setting. Topline findings show that chronic wounds impact nearly 15% of Medicare beneficiaries (8.2 million) at an annual cost to Medicare conservatively estimated at $28.1 to $31.7 billion. Key findings
The Alliance led a panel discussion "Harnessing Big Data for Wound Healing Research: Which is More Relevant in the Quest for Evidence - Patient Centered Outcomes or Randomized Trials?"
at the 2016 International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR) meeting in Washington D.C. Panelists included Marcia Nusgart (moderator), Dr. Caroline Fife, Dr. Marissa Carter and AHRQ's Dr. Elise Berliner.Download the Presentation Read more:
See the Value of Wound Care research page
for insights on innovative trends in wound care research today,
The Alliance recognized the need to craft a white paper on criteria for conducting methodologically sound randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs) as well as address the importance and relative strength of non-RCT research in the wound care field. In 2010, the assembled a team of prominent, respected wound care researchers to address this task. The team was called the Panel On Wound Care Evidence Based Research
and its ensuing paper, “Consensus Principles for Wound Care Research Obtained Using a Delphi Process”
was published in the 2012 May/June edition of Wound Repair and Regeneration
. The paper established a series of principles for all stakeholders involved in clinical or comparative effectiveness research in wound healing.